I’m thrilled that the producers of this film have decided to shine a massive magnifying glass on the popular theory that 1) Madeleine McCann is still alive 12 years after her “abduction” and 2) that the toddler was abducted by sex traffickers/pedophiles.
For some time I’ve felt this theory deserves a really good airing in the mainstream, and for folks who believe it to put up their hands, wave their flag of allegiance so we can see it, and make their voices heard.
It should be noted in Kate McCann’s book she makes the case for some sort of pedophile assault on her three-year-old child:
To date I’ve written a trilogy on the McCann case dealing with why Madeleine is certainly dead, how and why she died, and how and where her body was initially hidden before being finally disposed of.
In the DOUBT trilogy I didn’t want to contaminate the original hypothesis with conspiracy theories, of which there are many, just as there are in the JonBenet Ramsey case.
Just as in the JonBenet Ramsey case, the pedophile scenario invokes some sick, shadowy outsider breaking into the family home [despite the risk of others being home], and then abducts the child etc but forgets to leave any evidence of himself. No footprints, no fingerprints, no fiber, no DNA, no witnesses seeing him breaking and entering, or exiting. Zero. Zip. Nada. But he exists.
In the Ramsey case the pedophile intruder breaks into the home to have sex with his victim, kidnaps her from her bed, bludgeons and strangles the little girl, but then forgets to have sex with her and escapes through a window and levitates over snow without waking anyone up. If no one heard or saw him, if his abduction was successful for all intents and purposes, why did he abandon the victim that he risked it all for?
But instead of removing his clothes and performing sexual acts, as is his nature, the pedophile apparently elects to sit down to write a three-page Ransom Note [which takes roughly 20 minutes] using materials inside the house. This is what he chooses to do with his alone time with the victim.
Yet as absurd as that theory was, District Attorney Mary Lacy bought into it hook, line and sinker, and more than 20 years later, the mainstream media is still hopping from one pedophile suspect to the next in an endless game of “find the pedophile”.
Who does this benefit? Clearly it benefits someone.
Pedophile Confesses to Killing JonBenet Ramsey in Letters to Friend – Rolling Stone [January, 2019]
I killed JonBenét Ramsey!’ Convicted pedophile Gary Oliva has confessed to the murder of six-year-old pageant princess in prison letters to his friend – claiming it was ‘an accident’ – MSN [January, 2019]
Although Gary Oliva has suddenly been receiving a lot of press again in 2019, immediately following the recent settlement of the $750 million lawsuit between Burke Ramsey’s lawyer and CBS, he’s hardly a new suspect. As early as 2002 Oliva was identified, investigated and apparently cleared as a suspect by the cops in Boulder.
From Daily Camera:
In the 2002 jailhouse interview that was part of the “48 Hours Investigates” broadcast, Oliva denied hurting or killing JonBenet. He also said he had never used a stun gun on a child. But Oliva did admit to an obsession with the Ramseys’ youngest child. “I believe she came to me after she was killed and revealed herself to me,” he said. “I’d like to see a memorial set up for her. I haven’t seen that, anywhere.”
In an interview with the Daily Camera after the 2002 CBS broadcast, then-Boulder Police chief Mark Beckner said Oliva remained a suspect in the Ramsey case.
Interestingly, although Oliva is making the headlines now, the cops gave no credence to Oliva in October 2002. In fact CBS reported:
Smit is convinced that a pedophile came into the Ramsey home and killed their daughter. “I’ve probably got 25 good leads. And I probably have another 50 pages of other leads to follow,” he says.
Among the files he’s keeping on sex offenders in Boulder, Gary Oliva’s name stands out. Police said that in 1991, months after he sexually assaulted the little girl, Oliva tried to strangle his mother with a telephone cord. And in December 1996, Oliva, then a fugitive and a homeless drifter, may have been less than a block away from the Ramsey’s house.
Why aren’t the Boulder police taking these leads more seriously? Police have dismissed Oliva because his DNA doesn’t match evidence at the scene. The Ramseys say police have a double standard: While some suspects have been cleared because their DNA doesn’t match, they have not been cleared for the same reason.
Just this week, police said Oliva is not a suspect. Sources say his DNA doesn’t match evidence at the scene.
Now we’re seeing a similar narrative play out in the McCann case, except the pedophile abduction theory isn’t new here either. The #1 suspect originally on the sex trafficking conspiracy radar appeared to be Robert Murat – basically the McCann version of Gary Oliva – except Murat’s a lot more of an upstanding citizen.
The false “tip-offs” started as early as May 2007, the same month as Madeleine’s disappearance.
False tip-offs hamper hunt for Madeleine – The Guardian
As such, Murat successfully sued several newspapers for defamation for printing slurs about him as early as one year after Madeleine’s “abduction”.
But because Murat lived quite close to the crime scene [like Oliva], he was sort of an obvious default choice as prime suspect, aside from the original prime suspects of course.
Based on the trailer, it seems Murat will be mentioned as part of the pedophile narrative not so much implicating him, but implicating 1) the pedophile conspiracy narrative and thus giving it some substance and 2) accusing the authorities [presumably the Portuguese cops] of an improper investigation, thus undermining their allegations [including those identifying the parents as arguidos/suspects].
I have made passing remarks in my three narratives to debunk the pedophile/abductor theory, starting with the obvious. If a stranger abductor wants to steal a child, the easiest way to do that is in a public area like a beach or a park. What an abductor won’t do nine times out of ten is break into a locked or secure home, grab the child [leaving traces of himself], and then break out again, all with the threat of being caught in flagrante delicto.
But mre important than imputing the typical profile of a stranger abductor, is looking at the behavior of the parents following the abduction. In the Ramseys’ case, following the murder of their daughter by a random kidnapping pedophile, what did they do – they sent their other child to another nearby residence and never seemed particularly concerned for Burke’s safety. By January 1997, within a month of his sister’s murder, Burke was back at school and his father back at work, back to business as usual.
He continued going to the same school, and security protocols at the school were casual, to put it mildly. Not the sort of thing a parent convinced their child was attacked by a neighborhood monster still-at-large would do, and of course, Burke Ramsey himself wasn’t in the least bit frightened either. No nightmares. Not much concern that his sister had been killed in the basement either. In fact when Burke was asked why he wasn’t at school during those first weeks, it wasn’t to hide away from an attacker, but the press.
In the McCann case, it’s not often reported that the McCanns continued to stay in the Ocean Club hotel for an additional two months following the “abduction”. Besides that, their other two children continued to be dropped off at the Ocean Club creche as per normal, immediately following the abduction. When the McCanns left to see the Pope in May 2007 [less than a month after Madeleine’s “disappearance”, they left both their children behind in the pedophile paradise of Praia da Luz before continuing a whirlwind tour of Europe
They have left their two-year-old twins in the Algarve with Mr McCann’s sister, Trish Cameron, and her husband Sandy, deciding they were too young to take on the trip to Italy. The couple are also due to visit Spain, the Netherlands, Morocco and Germany to raise awareness of their daughter’s disappearance.
In fact the pictures the tabloid media were able to get of the couple in the weeks following the abduction were all at the resort as they went to drop off their other children at the creche first thing in the morning, so that they could concentrate on attending to the PR surrounding Madeleine.
**ALL ROUND PICTURES FROM SOLARPIX.COM** **WORLDWIDE SYNDICATION RIGHTS** Gerry and Kate McCann whose 3 year old daughter, Madeleine, was abducted from their holiday apartment in the Algarve, Portugal, on Thursday May 3rd 2007. Mum and Dad Gerry and Kate McCann attend a vigil at the church in Praia da Luz after spending Madeline’s Birthday away in a private Villa May 12th 2007, 9 days after Madeleine’s disappearance. This pic: Kate and Gerry McCann JOB REF: 4768 CSH DATE: 12_05_2007 **MUST CREDIT SOLARPIX.COM OR DOUBLE FEE WILL BE CHARGED* *UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES IS THIS IMAGE TO BE REPRODUCED FOR ANY ONLINE EDITION WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION*
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Mark Large/Daily Mail/Shutterstock (3434337a) Gerry Mccann And Kate Mccann Take Their Children Sean And Amelie To The Creche In Praia Da Luz Portugal. Kate Mccann Carries A Soft Toy And A Picture Of Madeleine. Their Daughter Madeleine Went Missing From The Family’s Holiday Apartment On May 3. Picture – Mark Large … 15.05.07. Gerry Mccann And Kate Mccann Take Their Children Sean And Amelie To The Creche In Praia Da Luz Portugal. Kate Mccann Carries A Soft Toy And A Picture Of Madeleine. Their Daughter Madeleine Went Missing From The Family’s Holiday Apartment On May 3. P
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Mark Large/Daily Mail/Shutterstock (1153136a) Gerry Mccann And Kate Mccann Take Their Twins Sean And Amelie To The Creche At The Ocean Club Resort In Praia Da Luz Portugal. Their Daughter Madeleine Mccannn Was Abducted From Her Hotel Room. Gerry Mccann And Kate Mccann Take Their Twins Sean And Amelie To The Creche At The Ocean Club Resort In Praia Da Luz Portugal. Their Daughter Madeleine Mccannn Was Abducted From Her Hotel Room.
Mandatory Credit: Photo by Mark Large/ANL/Shutterstock (2098632a) Gerry Mccann And Kate Mccann Take Their Twins Sean And Amelie To The Creche At The Ocean Club Resort In Praia Da Luz Portugal. Their Daughter Madeleine Mccannn Was Abducted From Her Hotel Room. Gerry Mccann And Kate Mccann Take Their Twins Sean And Amelie To The Creche At The Ocean Club Resort In Praia Da Luz Portugal. Their Daughter Madeleine Mccannn Was Abducted From Her Hotel Room.
Lagos, PORTUGAL: Kate (L) and Gerry (R) Mccann, the parents of four-year-old Madeleine McCann, carry their twins as they walk 16 May 2007 outside The Ocean Club in Praia da Luz, Lagos, in the Portuguese southern province of Algarve. A British man under investigation over the disappearance of four-year-old girl in Portugal said he had been made a scapegoat in the case, which has drawn international attention. Robert Murat has gone into hiding since he was formally named as a suspect over the disappearance of Madeleine McCann and his home was searched. Portuguese police said however that they did not have enough evidence to arrest him. AFP PHOTO/ FRANCISCO LEONG (Photo credit should read FRANCISCO LEONG/AFP/Getty Images)
LAGOS, PORTUGAL – MAY 22: Kate McCann, the mother of missing girl Madeleine, holds her daughter Amelie’s hand while dropping her off at the nursery at the Ocean Club holiday resort on May 22, 2007 in Praia da Luz, Portugal. Kate’s 4-year-old daughter Madeleine vanished May 3 from the resort apartment where she was on vacation. (Photo by Denis Doyle/Getty Images)
Lagos, PORTUGAL: Kate (L) and Gerry (R) Mccann, parents of Madeleine McCann, carry their children outside The Ocean Club in Praia da Luz, Lagos, 16 May 2007, on the Portuguese southern province of Algarve. A British man under investigation over the disappearance the four-year-old girl in Portugal said he had been made a scapegoat in the case, which has drawn international attention. AFP PHOTO/ FRANCISCO LEONG (Photo credit should read FRANCISCO LEONG/AFP/Getty Images)
But that’s not the most ridiculous aspect of this conspiracy. That is reserved for the idea that all evidence to the contrary, Madeleine is still alive. With zero confirmed evidence of Madeleine being sighted in twelve years, Madeleine still being alive is based on less evidence than that she isn’t.
McCann team tests car for traces of Madeleine – Telegraph 
Witness Statement of Alexander James CAMERON – PJFiles 
Detectives ask: Where did the car go? – Daily Star [September 16, 2007]
It’s this narrative that Madeleine is still alive that’s the reason I believe this documentary actually has the tacit support of the McCanns despite appearances to the contrary. The fact that the documentary is coming out a month before the 12th anniversary of her disappearance isn’t an accident. It’s been carefully planned and executed. So much of this case is about precisely that – appearances and PR. And after losing their latest lawsuit, the McCanns need some fresh impetus to their bogus “there is always hope” spiel.
Top British police officer Jim Gamble claims that they’ll find Maddie within his lifetime, according to Daily Mail reports.
“There’s huge hope to be had with the advances in technology. Year on year DNA is getting better,” Gamble has said, “Year on year other techniques, including facial recognition, are getting better. “And as we use that technology to revisit and review that which we captured in the past, there’s every likelihood that something we already know will slip into position.”
It’s been suggested that Maddie is still alive and was taken by human traffickers because of her financial value as a “middle-class British girl”, Metro reports. The long-awaited documentary is expected to be released on Friday, despite opposition from Madeleine’s family.
Her parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, have repeatedly refused to take part in the show, according to The Guardian. They’ve also reportedly urged others to refuse doing interviews with production house Pulse Films, who’s making the series.